Use case

    AP invoice approvals with exceptions and audit trails

    Operationalize accounts payable: invoice intake, 2/3-way match checks, approvals, exception handling, and closure evidence—so finance can move fast without losing control.

    No credit card required. Switch to a paid plan any time.

    Procurement policy gate

    Adjust amount and vendor risk. Watch approval gates and required evidence artifacts change automatically.

    Approval tier

    Medium

    Goal: speed with proof, not meetings.

    Inputs

    Amount $12,500

    Vendor risk 42

    Approval gates

    Budget owner

    Procurement

    Evidence artifacts
    • policy_check record + rationale
    • approval_record (who/when/why)
    • vendor_risk_assessment (if new)

    Principle

    Policy gates are strongest when they are workflow steps that produce evidence artifacts—so approvals don’t turn into email archaeology.

    Definition

    Audit-ready AP approvals capture match results, approval decisions, exception reasons, and payment evidence as structured artifacts—so exceptions are measurable and improvement is continuous.

    Impact

    Results teams are seeing

    ↓ 15–35%

    Invoice cycle time

    Match rules + threshold routing

    ↓ 10–25%

    Exception rate

    Standard codes + remediation loop

    ↑ 2×

    Straight-through

    Fewer rework loops with explicit decision points

    Capabilities

    What you can do with Process Designer

    Match results as artifacts

    Store match_result and system event IDs so decisions are provable.

    Approvals by threshold

    Route exceptions and approvals based on amount, vendor, and category.

    Exception codes that improve the system

    Codes trigger remediation—reducing future exceptions.

    Closure evidence for payments

    payment_event_id + reconciliation notes make audits fast.

    Use cases

    Where teams apply Process Designer

    Real workflows that benefit from visual design, automation, and governance.

    Invoice intake + validation

    A reusable pattern with clear ownership, approvals, and evidence artifacts—designed to scale across teams.

    2/3-way match decision points

    A reusable pattern with clear ownership, approvals, and evidence artifacts—designed to scale across teams.

    Threshold approvals and exceptions

    A reusable pattern with clear ownership, approvals, and evidence artifacts—designed to scale across teams.

    Payment closure evidence

    A reusable pattern with clear ownership, approvals, and evidence artifacts—designed to scale across teams.

    How it works

    From chaos to clarity in 4 steps

    1

    Model the flow

    Define the backbone workflow, decision points, and handoff contracts (inputs/outputs).

    2

    Attach governance

    Add approvals, exception paths, and evidence artifacts to the decision points.

    3

    Run and capture proof

    Guide execution and capture structured records automatically as work happens.

    4

    Measure and improve

    Monitor exceptions and drift; publish scorecards and remediate red items.

    Implementation

    Your path to process excellence

    A phased approach that delivers value at each step.

    1

    Week 1

    Backbone workflow + evidence map

    Pick one workflow, map decision points, and define the minimum evidence backbone.

    • Select two focus areas as your pilot: Invoice intake + validation + 2/3-way match decision points
    • Define decision points, owners, and approval gates
    • Create evidence artifacts for: match_result record + system event ids + approval record + rationale
    2

    Month 1

    Operationalize and measure

    Run the workflow with teams, capture evidence, and publish dashboards for outcomes + drift.

    • Publish dashboards for: Invoice cycle time + Exception rate (by code)
    • Standardize exception codes and escalation rules
    • Create remediation loop: red items → owner → SLA → closure evidence
    3

    Quarter 1

    Scale patterns across departments

    Reuse the patterns across adjacent workflows and reduce variance without adding bureaucracy.

    • Expand to remaining focus areas: Threshold approvals and exceptions, Payment closure evidence
    • Add automation where stable, but keep approvals and evidence as first-class steps
    • Review monthly: drift signals, exceptions, and evidence completeness

    Industries

    Tailored for your industry

    Finance / Procurement

    Challenge

    Approvals are slow, exceptions are noisy, and leakage is hard to quantify.

    How we help

    Policy checks + thresholds + evidence artifacts make spend governance measurable.

    Example: AP invoice approvals + exceptions

    Legal / GRC

    Challenge

    Approvals exist, but proof is fragmented across tools.

    How we help

    Decision points produce structured artifacts so compliance is queryable.

    Example: Contract approvals + exception records

    Playbook

    2/3-way match: turn rules into decision points

    Explicitly model match rules and the decision outcome (match_ok / mismatch / missing_doc). Each outcome routes to a different owner and produces evidence artifacts.

    Exception loop: reduce future rework

    Every exception should generate a code and remediation signal. High-frequency exceptions are process problems—fix upstream validation, not downstream heroics.

    Closure evidence: reconcile without archaeology

    Link approvals and match results to the payment event ID. That single join eliminates most audit reconstruction work.

    Pilot

    Pilot checklist (60 minutes to first value)

    Start here

    • Model match rules and outcomes as explicit decision points

    • Standardize exception codes with owners

    • Route approvals by thresholds and categories

    • Capture payment_event_id and reconciliation evidence

    • Review top exception codes weekly and remediate upstream

    Q&A

    Frequently asked questions

    Learn more about how Process Designer works and how it can help your organization.